Black bear adaptation to low productivity in the boreal forest
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Long snowy winters combined with a short growing season make boreal forests an unproductive environment that challenges black bears (Ursus americanus). We used resource selection functions (based on GPS telemetry of 16 bears), diet analysis, surveys of plant phenology, and vegetation inventories to study adaptations of black bears to boreal forest. Because plants are heavily favoured in bear diets, we expected diet composition to reflect their temporal availability. We anticipated that bears would make choices among land cover types and specific topographic conditions in order to select plants that would fulfil their energetic demands throughout the active period. We also predicted that bears would select habitats modified by insect outbreaks or forest harvesting because these disturbances likely increase resource availability. We found supporting evidence for all of our predictions. (1) Bear diet was closely linked to plant availability. (2) Bears made seasonal altitudinal movements and selected sites according to solar irradiation, tracking the availability of the most digestible plants. Accordingly, bears relied on high-altitude graminoids in spring, a variety of fleshy fruits in summer, and mainly Sorbus americana berries in autumn. (3) Land covers resulting from clearcutting and insect outbreaks increased resource availability for bears and were preferred from summer to autumn. In our study area, black bears are considered predators of a threatened caribou (Rangifer tarandus) population. Even so, we did not find any caribou remains in bear scats. However, our results show that forestry practices, such as clearcutting near the caribou range, could contribute to increased bear presence and thus increase the probability of predation. Nomenclature: Wilson & Reeder, 1993; Marie-Victorin, 1995.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it