MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142142556 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2008.4518333

Maximum likelihood binary detection in improper complex gaussian noise

2008· article· en· W2142142556 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDetectorMatched filterBinary numberGaussian noiseFilter (signal processing)AlgorithmMeasure (data warehouse)Computer scienceGaussianNoise (video)Complex normal distributionSIGNAL (programming language)Detection theorySignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)MathematicsArtificial intelligencePhysicsTelecommunicationsData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a wide range of communication systems, including DS-CDMA and OFDM systems, the signal-of-interest might be corrupted by an improper (F.D. Neeser et al.,1993) (also called non circularly symmetric (B. Picinbono, 1994)) interfering signal. This paper studies the maximum likelihood (ML) detection of binary signals in the presence of additive improper complex Gaussian noise. Proposing a new measure for noncircularity of complex random variables, we will derive the ML decision rule and its performance based on this measure. It will be shown that the ML detector performs pseudo correlation (F.D. Neeser et al.,1993) as well as conventional correlation of the observation to the signals-of-interest. As an alternative solution, we will propose a filter for converting improper signals to proper ones, called circularization filter, and will utilize it together with a conventional matched-filter (MF) to construct an ML detector.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.660
Threshold uncertainty score0.682

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it