MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142155648 · doi:10.1109/vtcf.2006.421

BER Transfer Chart Analysis of Turbo Frequency Domain Equalization

2006· article· en· W2142155648 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Vehicular Technology Conference · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurbo equalizerEXIT chartBit error rateEqualization (audio)TurboComputer scienceTransfer functionEqualizerAlgorithmTurbo codeFrequency domainChartDecoding methodsMathematicsChannel (broadcasting)StatisticsTelecommunicationsLow-density parity-check codeEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we analyze the performance of a turbo frequency domain equalizer using the BER transfer chart. This tool evaluates the signal to noise ratio improvement at the decoder input during iterations. We derive a formula for the variance of the equalizer output at each iteration as a function of the error probability of the previous iteration. By defining an equivalent SNR based on the equalizer output mean and variance, and knowing the decoder bit error rate curve, we are able to evaluate the bit error rate of the decoder output in each iteration. Compared to the initially proposed BER transfer charts, this method gives us a more accurate curve for the equalizer and follows the dynamic of the process. Simulation results show that this method can predict the performance of the system with reasonable accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.485
Threshold uncertainty score0.826

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it