MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142326989 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450790110

Optimization of amino acids production from waste fish entrails by hydrolysis in sub and supercritical water

2001· article· en· W2142326989 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSubcritical and Supercritical Water Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
KeywordsSupercritical fluidYield (engineering)HydrolysisAmino acidDecompositionChemistryFish <Actinopterygii>ChromatographyNuclear chemistryOrganic chemistryBiochemistryMaterials scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A resource recovery technique using sub‐ and supercritical water hydrolysis was applied to convert waste fish entrails into amino acids. The effect of reaction parameters such as temperature and time necessary for the control of reaction towards optimum yield of amino acids was investigated. Results showed a maximum yield of total amino acids (137 mg/g dry fish) from waste fish entrails at T = 523 K ( P = 4 MPa) and reaction time of 60 min in a batch reactor. Under supercritical conditions (e. g., T = 653 K , P = 45 MPa), the yield decreases due to rapid decomposition compared to production rate of amino acids. The results suggest operation of the system at short reaction time and mild temperature condition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.357

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.158
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it