MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142548369 · doi:10.1017/jfm.2013.551

Time-dependent, non-monotonic mixing in stratified turbulent shear flows: implications for oceanographic estimates of buoyancy flux

2013· article· en· W2142548369 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Mechanics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCompute Canada
KeywordsRichardson numberReynolds numberTurbulenceBuoyancyPhysicsMechanicsStratified flowsMixing (physics)Shear flowThermodynamicsStratified flowMonotonic functionMathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We employ direct numerical simulation to investigate the efficiency of diapycnal mixing by shear-induced turbulence in stably stratified free shear layers for flows with bulk Richardson numbers in the range $0. 12\leq R{i}_{0} \leq 0. 2$ and Reynolds number $Re= 6000$ . We show that mixing efficiency depends non-monotonically upon $R{i}_{0} $ , peaking in the range 0.14–0.16, which coincides closely with the range in which both the buoyancy flux and the dissipation rate are maximum. By detailed analyses of the energetics of flow evolution and the underlying dynamics, we show that the existence of high mixing efficiency in the range $0. 14\lt R{i}_{0} \lt 0. 16$ is due to the emergence of a large number of small-scale instabilities which do not exist at lower Richardson numbers and are stabilized at high Richardson numbers. As discussed in Mashayek & Peltier ( J. Fluid Mech. , vol. 725, 2013, pp. 216–261), the existence of such a well-populated ‘zoo’ of secondary instabilities at intermediate Richardson numbers and the subsequent high mixing efficiency is realized only if the Reynolds number is higher than a critical value which is generally higher than that achievable in laboratory settings, as well as that which was achieved in the majority of previous numerical studies of shear-induced stratified turbulence. We furthermore show that the primary assumptions upon which the widely employed Osborn ( J. Phys. Oceanogr. vol. 10, 1980, pp. 83–89) formula is based, as well as its counterparts and derivatives, which relate buoyancy flux to dissipation rate through a (constant) flux coefficient ( $\Gamma $ ), fail at higher Richardson numbers provided that the Reynolds number is sufficiently high. Specifically, we show that the assumptions of fully developed, stationary, and isotropic turbulence all break down at high Richardson numbers. We show that the breakdown of these assumptions occurs most prominently at Richardson numbers above that corresponding to the maximum mixing efficiency, a fact that highlights the importance of the non-monotonicity of the dependence of mixing efficiency upon Richardson number, which we establish to be characteristic of stratified shear-induced turbulence. At high $R{i}_{0} $ , the lifecycle of the turbulence is composed of a rapidly growing phase followed by a phase of rapid decay. Throughout the lifecycle, there is considerable exchange of energy between the small-scale turbulence and larger coherent structures which survive the various stages of flow evolution. Since shear instability is one of the most prominent mechanisms for turbulent dissipation of energy at scales below hundreds of metres and at various depths of the ocean, our results have important implications for the inference of turbulent diffusivities on the basis of microstructure measurements in the oceanic environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.641
Threshold uncertainty score0.572

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it