MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Global Ca isotope variations in c. 0.7 Ga old post-glacial carbonate successions

2010· article· en· W2142728141 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueTerra Nova · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
KeywordsGeologyCarbonateGlacial periodWeatheringDeglaciationSilicateGeochemistryPaleontologyCarbonate rockSedimentary rockChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Terra Nova, 22, 188–194, 2010 Abstract To discriminate and correlate Neoproterozoic post-glacial carbonate successions, isotopic stratigraphy has been attempted in recent years. We report here the development of a new, promising discriminant, the 44Ca/40Ca isotope ratio. Two well-preserved carbonate successions overlying c. 0.7 Ga old glaciogenic deposits in central Brazil and NW Canada display similar Ca isotope time series. The Ca isotope stratigraphic profiles of these are similar to that of a weakly metamorphosed c. 0.7 Ga old carbonate succession in NE Brazil, suggesting robust preservation of the original Ca isotopic compositions. The Ca isotopic record is a reliable archive of changes in the oceanic Ca isotopic composition. It suggests rapid glacier melting and large increase in the Ca input to the ocean immediately after deglaciation, followed by progressive increase in carbonate precipitation, balancing the large initial Ca input. The global δ44Ca pattern recorded by c. 0.7 Ga old cap carbonates monotonically increases from ∼0‰ to 1‰, very different from the oscillation between ∼0‰ and 2‰ of the c. 0.64 Ga old global glaciation. This implies a difference in Ca mass balance evolution amongst the two deglaciation events. A possible explanation is that the high pCO2 built up during the first glaciation was consumed quickly by silicate weathering, while after the subsequent glaciation, the recently formed cap carbonates were redissolved first, followed only later by silicate weathering. The different Ca isotopic evolutions support Ca isotope stratigraphy as a reliable tool to discriminate amongst Neoproterozoic post-glacial carbonate successions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.425
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it