MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142738316 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2005.1577745

Applying PR-SCTP to transport SIP traffic

2005· article· en· W2142738316 on OpenAlexaff
Xiao‐Lei Wang, Victor C. M. Leung

Bibliographic record

VenueGLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005. · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStream Control Transmission ProtocolRetransmissionComputer networkSession Initiation ProtocolComputer scienceTransport layerReliability (semiconductor)Session (web analytics)The InternetLayer (electronics)Network packetServerOperating systemChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the proliferation of multimedia applications over the Internet, which employ the session initiation protocol (SIP) for session management signaling, efficient transport of SIP traffic becomes increasingly important. In this paper, we propose a scheme to effectively apply the partial reliability extension of the stream control transmission protocol (PR-SCTP) to transport SIP traffic over the Internet. In the proposed scheme, SIP messages are sent with partially reliable or unreliable PR-SCTP transport according to their types and requirements, and both application and transport layer retransmission mechanisms are properly coordinated to efficiently retransmit lost data. Simulation results show that, compared with UDP and SCTP, the proposed scheme employing PR-SCTP improves the performance of SIP transport under both high and low levels of SIP traffic

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005.Same topicIPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, SecurityFrench-language works237,207