MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142738316 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2005.1577745

Applying PR-SCTP to transport SIP traffic

2005· article· en· W2142738316 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005. · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStream Control Transmission ProtocolRetransmissionComputer networkSession Initiation ProtocolComputer scienceTransport layerReliability (semiconductor)Session (web analytics)The InternetLayer (electronics)Network packetServerOperating systemChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the proliferation of multimedia applications over the Internet, which employ the session initiation protocol (SIP) for session management signaling, efficient transport of SIP traffic becomes increasingly important. In this paper, we propose a scheme to effectively apply the partial reliability extension of the stream control transmission protocol (PR-SCTP) to transport SIP traffic over the Internet. In the proposed scheme, SIP messages are sent with partially reliable or unreliable PR-SCTP transport according to their types and requirements, and both application and transport layer retransmission mechanisms are properly coordinated to efficiently retransmit lost data. Simulation results show that, compared with UDP and SCTP, the proposed scheme employing PR-SCTP improves the performance of SIP transport under both high and low levels of SIP traffic

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.741
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it