WLC17-3: Performance of IEEE802.16 Random Access Protocol - Transient Queueing Analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we consider the transient queueing response of IEEE802.16 random access protocol with piggyback and automatic repeat request. The random access protocol of IEEE 802.16 is physically based on orthogonal frequency- division-multiple-access (OFDMA)-code-division-multiple-access (CDMA) with time division duplexing (TDD) mode. In medium access control (MAC) layer, the protocol is a type of demand- assigned multiple access (DAMA) with piggyback, in which a bandwidth request can be allowed either before transmitting data or at the end of data transmission. The model of our interest is an M/G/l type queue with set-up times and exhaustive service, which is solved by a generating function approach. In the analysis, we obtain the time dependent mean queue length, the time dependent empty probability of the queue and the time dependent busy period. The random access success probability is derived from the system equilibrium. Retransmission probability is also derived by including a binary exponential backoff algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it