Grid resources pricing: A novel financial option based quality of service-profit quasi-static equilibrium model
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Use of grid resources has been free so far and a trend is developing to charge the users. The challenges that characterize a grid resource pricing model include the dynamic ability of the model to provide a high satisfaction guarantee measured as quality of service (QoS) - from users perspectives, profitability constraints - from the grid operator perspectives, and the ability to orchestrate grid resources for their availability on-demand. In this study, we design, develop, and simulate a grid resources pricing model that balances these constraints. We employ financial option theory and treat the grid resources as real assets to capture the realistic value of the grid compute commodities. We then price the grid resources by solving the finance model. We discuss the results on pricing of compute cycles based on the actual data of grid usage pattern obtained from the WestGrid and the SHARCNET. We extend and generalize our study to any computational grid.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it