MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Navigating by Means of a Position Potential

2000· article· en· W2143611543 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNAVIGATION Journal of the Institute of Navigation · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPosition (finance)TrajectoryKalman filterInertiaComputer scienceSequence (biology)Particle filterAlgorithmVariable (mathematics)Extended Kalman filterControl theory (sociology)Artificial intelligenceMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: We have designed a new navigation algorithm that relies solely on measurements of vehicle position, velocity, and their error statistics. We consider the statistical confidence regions of position fixes as “sources” tending to “attract” the undetermined trajectory to pass through these regions. Based on these position fixes and their error statistics, a real-time potential field is constructed in which a mass particle with variable mass inertia is forced to move. To make the algorithm flexible to accommodate a changing navigation environment, we leave some parameters free and determine their values using a sequence of past observations and the least-squares criterion of discrepancies between position fixes and computed trajectory. A comparison with a Kalman filter navigation algorithm on real-life trajectories is also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.531
Threshold uncertainty score0.445

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it