MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143630778 · doi:10.1109/robot.2004.1307465

CMAC adaptive control of flexible-joint robots using backstepping with tuning functions

2004· article· en· W2143630778 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBacksteppingPayload (computing)Computer scienceControl theory (sociology)Artificial neural networkRobotLyapunov functionCompensation (psychology)Adaptive controlTracking errorTrajectoryNonlinear systemControl engineeringStrict-feedback formArtificial intelligenceControl (management)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A neural network used in a direct-adaptive control scheme can achieve trajectory tracking of a (highly) flexible joint robot holding an unknown payload without need for many learning repetitions. A modification of the Lyapunov stable nonlinear control method known as backstepping with tuning functions is derived to achieve this. Specifically, the introduction of appropriate weightings of the different tuning-function terms results in high performance. Also, a robust redesign of the tuning function method is presented to account for the uniform approximation (modeling) error of the neural network. This computationally burdensome method is made practical by taking advantage of the efficient structure of the CMAC neural network. Simulations with a (highly) flexible-joint robot show immediate compensation for a payload with performance nearly recovered after five seconds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.818

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsFrench-language works237,207