MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143664221 · doi:10.1093/comjnl/bxr061

Leveraging Service Discovery in MANETs with Mobile Directories

2011· article· en· W2143664221 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Computer Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicService-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary scienceService (business)Computer scienceColumbia universityWorld Wide WebMedia studiesSociologyBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper advances a novel approach that facilitates the location of services and/or digital assets advertised by directories in a Mobile Ad hoc Network. The proposed Service Directory Placement Protocol (SDPP) improves scalability and reduces packet traffic overhead by advancing a multi-directory extension of an earlier approach that relied on the migration of a single directory through the network. This investigation demonstrates that modelling the directory replication problem as a Semi-Markov Decision Problem solved by means of a Reinforcement Learning technique known as Q-learning improves the performance of SDPP. Computer simulations validate the feasibility of the proposed scheme that enables packet overhead reductions between 15 and 75 %, whereas the directory location success rate improves by up to 11% when compared with pure broadcast flooding and other existing approaches in wireless networks where hosts move at walking speeds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.554
Threshold uncertainty score0.474

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it