Urbanization and Migration Patterns of Aboriginal Populations in Canada: A Half Century in Review (1951 to 2006)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Within Canada, Aboriginal populations have historically experienced significantly different levels and patterns of urbanization and migration than mainstream populations have. This article uses data from selected censuses, along with earlier studies, to explore long-term trends in Aboriginal urbanization and migration from 1951 to 2006.Migration between reserves and urban areas, and its role in the rapid growth of Aboriginal populations in urban areas, are considered from both historical and demographic perspectives, including a "components of growth" approach that assesses the contributions of migration, natural increase, and non-demographic factors (such as ethnic mobility and Aboriginal identity). The analysis of twelve major urban areas over the fifty-five-year period, including nine Urban Aboriginal Strategy (UAS) cities, suggests a preliminary typology of Aboriginal population growth in urban areas and implications for assessing the characteristics and needs of Aboriginal populations across different urban areas and the services provided for them.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it