MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144077305 · doi:10.1215/21562261-3089019

On an invariance property of the space of smooth vectors

2015· article· en· W2144077305 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueKyoto journal of mathematics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Algebra and Geometry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsCombinatoricsLinear subspaceUnitary representationSpace (punctuation)Lie groupProduct (mathematics)Pure mathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let (π,H) be a continuous unitary representation of the (infinite-dimen- sional) Lie group G, and let γ:R→Aut(G) be a group homomorphism which defines a continuous action of R on G by Lie group automorphisms. Let π#(g,t)=π(g)Ut be a continuous unitary representation of the semidirect product group G⋊γR on H. The first main theorem of the present note provides criteria for the invariance of the space H∞ of smooth vectors of π under the operators Uf=∫Rf(t)Utdt for f∈L1(R) and f∈S(R), respectively. When g is complete and the actions of R on G and g are continuous, we use the above theorem to show that, for suitably defined spectral subspaces gC(E), E⊆R, in the complexified Lie algebra gC and H∞(F), F⊆R, for Ut in H∞, we have dπ(gC(E))H∞(F)⊆H∞(E+F).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.351

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it