MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144303296 · doi:10.1287/ijoc.1090.0341

Path-Reduced Costs for Eliminating Arcs in Routing and Scheduling

2009· article· en· W2144303296 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueINFORMS journal on computing · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Routing Optimization Methods
Canadian institutionsKronos (Canada)HEC MontréalPolytechnique MontréalGroup for Research in Decision Analysis
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColumn generationMathematical optimizationComputer scienceSpeedupConstrained Shortest Path FirstShortest path problemVehicle routing problemPath (computing)Scheduling (production processes)Routing (electronic design automation)Context (archaeology)Longest path problemK shortest path routingMathematicsParallel computingTheoretical computer scienceComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In many branch-and-price algorithms, the column generation pricing problem consists of computing feasible paths in a network. In this paper, we show how, in this context, path-reduced costs can be used to remove some arcs from the underlying network without compromising optimality, and we introduce a bidirectional search technique to compute these reduced costs. This arc elimination method can lead to a substantial speedup of the pricing process and the overall branch-and-price algorithm. Special attention is given to variants of shortest-path problems with resource constraints. Computational results obtained for the vehicle routing problem with time windows show the efficiency of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.376
Threshold uncertainty score0.811

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it