MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144351143 · doi:10.1109/hpcs.2005.57

Topology Reconfiguration Mechanism for Traffic Engineering in WDM Optical Network

2005· article· en· W2144351143 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl reconfigurationWavelength-division multiplexingComputer scienceNetwork topologyComputer networkDistributed computingMultiplexingTopology (electrical circuits)Real-time computingEngineeringWavelengthTelecommunicationsEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Optical wavelength division multiplexed (WDM) networks provide an excellent transmission medium for voice and data traffic, streaming media, and high performance and grid computing needs. Rearrangeability is one compelling characteristic of WDM optical networks that allows network operators to rearrange the networks in response to changing traffic demands and element failures to provide improved network performance. Under changing traffic flows and abhorrent network conditions reconfiguration is an ongoing process. Available approaches are not able to handle extreme load conditions, traffic bursts, and element failures and, so far, these approaches cover only limited aspects of the problem of automated reconfiguration. In this work we present an adaptive reconfiguration mechanism for WDM optical networks (ARWON). Two heuristically based algorithms, combination algorithm (CA) and multi lightpath change (MLPC) algorithm, are also proposed to support implementation of ARWON. Simulation experiments covered all ranges of traffic flows and element failure scenario and performance of ARWON was validated with an established contemporary reconfiguration algorithm. Results show that under all loading conditions and link failure scenario ARWON performed better than the comparison algorithm. Under extreme loading conditions ARWON incurred 11 times less traffic loss than single lightpath change (SLPC) algorithm and on average SLPC was carrying 20 more lightpaths than ARWON, per observation cycle, that were 100 percent loaded. Under link failure scenario ARWON recovered faster and rerouted the traffic in one step, whereas SLPC recovered slowly and recovery took much longer duration than ARWON. For other loading conditions, ranging from low to high loading, it was observed that during early stages of simulation ARWON performs at par or marginally better than SLPC. Performance of ARWON steadily improves as simulation progresses over longer duration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.507
Threshold uncertainty score0.552

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Optical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207