MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144433150 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2005.1578390

On distributed space-time filtering

2005· article· en· W2144433150 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005. · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNode (physics)Computer scienceChannel (broadcasting)Relation (database)Filter (signal processing)AlgorithmGrassmannianUpper and lower boundsOptimization problemWirelessTopology (electrical circuits)Mathematical optimizationControl theory (sociology)MathematicsArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsEngineeringData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distributed space-time filtering (DSTF) has been recently proposed as a means for node cooperation in wireless networks. In this paper, we derive a new optimization criterion for the node signature filter vectors (SFVs) used in DSTF and we provide two practical design methods for sets of SFVs. We show that for the special case of a frequency-nonselective channel and two active nodes the SFV optimization problem is related to the design of Grassmannian frames. This relation allows us to derive a lower bound for the performance penalty incurred by the distributed implementation. We show that SFV sets designed with the proposed methods perform close to this lower bound and achieve a significant performance gain over previously proposed designs. Simulation results confirm the excellent performance of the proposed SFV sets in frequency-nonselective and frequency-selective channels

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.910
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0060.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it