MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144447931 · doi:10.1109/tsmca.2005.843385

Multiagent Immediate Incremental View Maintenance for Data Warehouses

2005· article· en· W2144447931 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics - Part A Systems and Humans · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Database Systems and Queries
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDowntimeData warehouseComputer scienceConsistency (knowledge bases)DelegateDatabaseProcess (computing)Materialized viewOperating systemDatabase designArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data warehouse systems typically designate downtime for view maintenance, ranging from tens of minutes to hours depending on the system size. We develop a multiagent system that achieves immediate incremental view maintenance (IIVM) for continuous updating of data warehouse views. We describe an IIVM system that processes updates as transactions are executed at the underlying data sources to eliminate view maintenance downtime for the data warehouse-a crucial requirement for internet applications. The use of a multiagent framework provides considerable process speed improvement when compared with other IIVM systems. Since agents are used to delegate the data sources and warehouse views, it is easy to reorganize the components of the system. Through the use of cooperative agents, the data consistency of IIVM can be easily maintained. The test results from this research show that the proposed system increases the availability of the data warehouse while preserving a stringent requirement on data consistency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it