MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144491711 · doi:10.5539/ijms.v2n1p225

Attitude towards Business Ethics: Examining the Influence of Religiosity, Gender and Education Levels

2010· article· en· W2144491711 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Marketing Studies · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicEthics in Business and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReligiosityIntrapersonal communicationInterpersonal communicationSocial psychologyPsychologyBusiness ethicsScale (ratio)Political sciencePublic relations

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to explore the influence of religiosity, gender and education levels on attitude towards businessethics. Religiosity has long been regarded as the key determinant in shaping ethical values. The well-establishedscale of Attitude Towards Business Ethics Questionnaire (ATBEQ) was adapted. Religiosity was measured usingthe Religious Commitment Inventory Scale (RCI-10). There are two dimensions of religiosity – intrapersonalreligiosity and interpersonal religiosity. Results showed that intrapersonal religiosity was a significantdeterminant to attitude towards business ethics but interpersonal religiosity was not. Comparisons were alsomade across several demographic characteristics with regards to business ethics. There was no significantdifference between gender. Significant difference was found in business ethics across different educationallevels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.025
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.142
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.210
Threshold uncertainty score0.865

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0250.142
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.338
GPT teacher head0.493
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it