On dominating your neighborhood profitably
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent research on skyline queries has attracted much interest in the database and data mining community. Given a database, an object belongs to the skyline if it cannot be dominated with respect to the given attributes by any other database object. Current methods have only considered so-called min/max attributes like price and quality which a user wants to minimize or maximize. However, objects can also have spatial attributes like x, y coordinates which can be used to represent relevant constraints on the query results. In this paper, we introduce novel skyline query types taking into account not only min/max attributes but also spatial attributes and the relationships between these different attribute types. Such queries support a micro-economic approach to decision making, considering not only the quality but also the cost of solutions. We investigate two alternative approaches for efficient query processing, a symmetrical one based on off-the-shelf index structures, and an asymmetrical one based on index structures with special purpose extensions. Our experimental evaluation using a real dataset and various synthetic datasets demonstrates that the new query types are indeed meaningful and the proposed algorithms are efficient and scalable. 1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it