MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144713027 · doi:10.1111/eip.12048

Towards a new paradigm of care: the International Declaration on Youth Mental Health

2013· editorial· en· W2144713027 on OpenAlexaff
Helen Coughlan, Mary Cannon, David Shiers, Paddy Power, Claire Barry, Tony Bates, Max Birchwood, Sarah Buckley, Derek Chambers, Simon Davidson, M. Bridget Duffy, Blánaid Gavin, Ciaran Healy, Colm Healy, Helen Keeley, Michael Maher, Chris Tanti, Patrick D. McGorry

Bibliographic record

VenueEarly Intervention in Psychiatry · 2013
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicChild and Adolescent Health
Canadian institutionsOntario Centre of Excellence for Child and Youth Mental HealthChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
FundersInspire Foundation
KeywordsDeclarationBATESMental healthExcellenceSociologyLibrary sciencePsychologyPolitical sciencePsychiatryLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A recent and growing body of evidence on young people's mental health has pointed to the need for an international response to the increasing and concerning rates of mental ill-health among young people.[1, 2] The periods of adolescence and emerging adulthood[3] are considered the peak periods for the onset of mental ill-health[4] with 75% of all adult diagnoses of mental ill-health having had an onset before the age of 25 years.[5] In an era when the physical health of young people has never been better,[6] their psychological and mental health has never been worse.[7] This leaves young people vulnerable to developing potentially intractable and enduring mental health difficulties with the inevitable personal, familial, social and vocational consequences that accompany the experience of mental ill-health.[4, 8]\nIn spite of growing concerns about young people's mental health, service provision for young people remains largely inadequate and unsuited to their needs. A number of systemic factors can be implicated in insufficient and unsuitable mental health service provision for young people. Internationally, there has been an endemic failure to invest in mental health across the lifespan with an average global spend on mental health of less than $US3 per capita per year.[9] This global underinvestment brings with it particular challenges in relation to the level of priority afforded to youth mental health and the concurrent commitment needed to respond to the scale of young people's mental health needs.\nEven in developed countries where mental health services exist, there are widespread problems with services targeting young people. Primary care and other front line community agencies can struggle to respond to high levels of need, often with little support from specialist mental health services. Specialist mental health services have traditionally followed a paediatric-adult split, with child and adolescent services offering intervention until the largely arbitrary ages of 16 or 18 years and adult services taking all young people 18 years and older.[1] In many instances, there have been gaps in service provision between the ages of 16 and 18 years.[10] This has resulted in many young people being unable to access specialist mental health support during these critical years along with high rates of attrition and dissatisfaction by young people during this transitional period.[11, 12] With a recognition that, in many sociocultural contexts, the transition from adolescence to adulthood is a variable one that spans a period from the mid-teens to the mid- to late-20s,[13] both young people and youth mental health advocates have called for a reorganization of mental health services to mirror this extended developmental period for young people.[2]\nNot surprisingly, there has been a trend of poor help seeking and engagement by young people in mental health services.[14, 15] A key challenge remains in supporting young people to reach out for help when they need it and early evidence suggests that factors such as ease of access, the physical environment, location, atmosphere, branding and peer influence can promote help seeking among young people.[12] It must be noted, however, that even when services are youth friendly and appropriate to their needs, individual and psychological factors strongly influence help-seeking behaviour among young people experiencing emotional or psychological distress.[16, 17]\nFrom both an economic[18] and a human impact perspective, there is a strong rationale to invest in efforts to tackle the reality of mental ill-health among the youth population.[2] Efforts to establish a new youth mental health paradigm have already begun and are gaining momentum internationally, reflected most recently in the establishment of a new International Association for Youth Mental Health (http://www.iaymh.org). The first International Youth Mental Health Conference was held in Melbourne, Australia, in 2010 and the second is being held in 2013 in Brighton, the UK (http://www.iaymh2013.com).\nThose involved in the youth mental health movement recognize that positively impacting on young people's mental health trajectories requires transformative change. Along with a need for early promotion, detection and intervention, stemming the tide of mental ill-health among young people requires a fundamental change in how we think about young people and their mental health. It demands that we challenge traditional approaches to service development and delivery and replace them with approaches that are inclusive and empowering for young people and their families. Young people and their families need to be involved in designing and implementing more creative, responsive, accessible and youth-friendly mental health services that have the capacity to meet their needs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.049
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.257

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0490.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.028
Scholarly communication0.0170.016
Open science0.0060.020
Research integrity0.0270.077
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations76
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEarly Intervention in PsychiatrySame topicChild and Adolescent HealthFrench-language works237,207