MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144748262 · doi:10.1109/cccrv.2004.1301427

Recovering the shading image under known illumination

2004· article· en· W2144748262 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicColor Science and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer visionArtificial intelligenceSpecular reflectionInpaintingComputer scienceChromaticitySpecular highlightRGB color modelShadingDiscriminative modelImage (mathematics)Computer graphics (images)OpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given a standard RGB color image, an approach to recovering the shading image, an intrinsic image that depends only on the geometry of the viewing situation, is presented. The approach is formulated for scenes that exhibit both diffuse and specular properties. It is discriminative in the sense that variations in intensity caused by material changes are first detected and then removed. Material changes are detected using a method based on color information alone. The method stems from a scheme proposed here to handle specularities under known scene illumination chromaticity. This scheme is also used to produce an image that is free of specular reflections. Any material changes are then removed from this specular-free image by using an inpainting technique. The performance of the proposed approach has been tested on synthetic images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.501
Threshold uncertainty score0.438

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicColor Science and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207