MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145103350 · doi:10.1109/89.966081

Linear prediction based packet loss concealment algorithm for PCM coded speech

2001· article· en· W2145103350 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Compression Techniques
Canadian institutionsNortel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinear predictionComputer scienceSpeech codingAlgorithmPacket lossSpeech recognitionNetwork packetVoice activity detectionLinear predictive codingFrame (networking)Pulse-code modulationSpeech processingSIGNAL (programming language)Speech enhancementResidualArtificial intelligenceNoise reductionTelecommunicationsComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the well-known problems in real-time packetized voice applications is the degradation in voice quality due to delayed or misrouted packets. When a voice packet does not arrive at the receiver on time, the receiver needs a packet loss concealment algorithm to generate a signal instead of the missing voice segment. In this paper we describe a high performance packet loss concealment algorithm for pulse code modulation (PCM) coded speech. The algorithm extracts the residual signal of the previously received speech by linear prediction analysis, uses periodic replication to generate an approximation for the excitation signal of missing speech, and generates synthesized speech using this excitation. It also performs overlap-and-adding and scaling operations to smooth out transitions at frame boundaries. The new algorithm is compared to other algorithms by subjective quality tests, and is found to be better than the existing algorithms in some cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it