MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145221255 · doi:10.1017/s0305004102005960

Weak amenability of certain classes of Banach algebras without bounded approximate identities

2002· article· en· W2145221255 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Operator Algebra Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsSubalgebraLocally compact spaceBanach algebraAbelian groupLocally compact groupPure mathematicsBounded functionGroup algebraCompact groupClass (philosophy)Commutative propertyAlgebra over a fieldBanach spaceMathematical analysisLie groupComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a recent paper [ 3 ] Dales and Pandey have shown that the class S p of Segal algebras is weakly amenable. In this paper, for various classes of Segal algebras, we characterize derivations and multipliers from a Segal algebra into itself and into its dual module. In particular, we prove that every Segal algebra on a locally compact abelian group is weakly amenable and an abstract Segal subalgebra of a commutative weakly amenable Banach algebra is weakly amenable. We also introduce the Lebesgue–Fourier algebra of a locally compact group G and study its Arens regularity when G is discrete or compact.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it