Distributed Resource Allocation for Relay-Aided Device-to-Device Communication: A Message Passing Approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Device-to-device (D2D) communication underlaying cellular wireless networks is a promising concept to improve user experience and resource utilization by allowing direct transmission between two cellular devices. In this paper, performance of network-assisted D2D communication is investigated where D2D traffic is carried through relay nodes. Considering a multi-user and multi-relay network, we propose a distributed solution for resource allocation with a view to maximizing network sum-rate. An optimization problem is formulated for radio resource allocation at the relays. The objective is to maximize end-to-end rate as well as satisfy the data rate requirements for cellular and D2D user equipments under total power constraint. Due to intractability of the resource allocation problem, we propose a solution approach using message passing technique where each user equipment sends and receives information messages to/from the relay node in an iterative manner with the goal of achieving an optimal allocation. Therefore, the computational effort is distributed among all the user equipments and the corresponding relay node. The convergence and optimality of the proposed scheme are proved and a possible distributed implementation of the scheme in practical LTE-Advanced networks is outlined. The numerical results show that there is a distance threshold beyond which relay-aided D2D communication significantly improves network performance with a small increase in end-to-end delay when compared to direct communication between D2D peers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it