Theoretical and Experimental Studies of Enflurane. Infrared Spectra in Solution, in Low-Temperature Argon Matrix and Blue Shifts Resulting from Dimerization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Theoretical studies are performed on enflurane (CHFCl-CF(2)-O-CHF(2)) to investigate the conformational properties and vibrational spectra. Calculations are carried out at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level along with a natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis. Experimental infrared spectra are investigated in carbon tetrachloride solution at room temperature and in argon matrix at 12 K. In agreement with previously reported data (Pfeiffer, A.; Mack, H.-G.; Oberhammer, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6384), it is shown that the four most stable conformers possess a trans configuration of the C-C-O-C skeleton and a gauche orientation of the CHF(2) group (with respect to the central C-O bond). These conformations are favored by electrostatic interaction between the H atom of the CHF(2) group and the F atoms of the central CF(2) group. Hyperconjugation effects from the O lone pairs to the antibonding orbitals of the neighboring C-H and C-F bonds also contribute to the stability of the four conformers. The vibrational frequencies, infrared intensities, and potential energy distributions are calculated at the same level of theory for the most stable conformers. On the basis of the theoretical results, these conformers are identified in an argon matrix. The influence of the concentration on the nu(CH) vibrations suggests the formations of higher aggregates in solution. Theoretical calculations are carried out on the enflurane dimer. The results show that the dimer is formed between two enflurane conformers having the largest stability. The dimer has an asymmetric cyclic structure, the two enflurane molecules being held together by two nonequivalent C-H...F hydrogen bonds, the C-H bond of the CHFCl group acting as a proton donor, and one of the F atoms of the CHF(2) groups acting as a proton acceptor. The theory predicts a contraction of 0.0014-0.0025 A of the two CH bonds involved in the interaction along with a blue shift of 30-38 cm(-1) of the corresponding nu(C-H) bands, in good agreement with the blue shifts of 35-39 cm(-1) observed in an argon matrix.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".