MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145479699 · doi:10.1149/2.004406jss

Hydrogen-Free Deposition of Nanocrystalline Diamond by Channel-Spark Electron Beam Ablation

2014· article· en· W2145479699 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceScanning electron microscopeRaman spectroscopyNanocrystalline materialDiamondCarbon filmAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Electron beam-induced depositionHydrogenChemical vapor depositionThin filmNanotechnologyOpticsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report on the preparation of hydrogen-free nanocrystalline diamond films by pulsed electron beam ablation (channel-spark) from a single target on silicon and stainless steel substrates and under different process conditions. The films have been grown from highly ordered pyrolytic graphite at room temperature in an argon atmosphere under a pressure of 0.6 Pa. This study aims at elucidating the influence of the accelerating voltage (13, 14.5, and 16 kV) and electron beam pulse repetition rate (5 and 8 Hz) on film morphology, grain size, carbon-carbon sp3 content, and crystalline fraction. The films have been characterized using visible-reflectance spectroscopy, visible-Raman spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and atomic force microscopy (AFM). The correlations between measurement data and film properties are examined and discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it