MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145615996 · doi:10.5555/2429759.2429863

SimPHO: an ontology for simulation modeling of population health

2012· article· en· W2145615996 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWinter Simulation Conference · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Analysis with R
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaArthritis Research Centre of CanadaStatistics CanadaMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceOntologyInteroperabilityPopulationSemantics (computer science)ReusePopulation healthVisualizationSoftware engineeringData scienceKnowledge managementData miningWorld Wide WebProgramming languageMedicineEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Simulation modeling of population health is being used increasingly for epidemiology research and public health policy-making. However, the impact of population health simulation models is inhibited by their complexity and the lack of established standards to describe these models. To address this issue, we are developing the Ontology for Simulation Modeling of Population Health (SimPHO) -- a formal, explicit, computer-readable approach to describing population health simulation models. SimPHO builds on previous work to classify and formally represent knowledge about simulation models, and incorporates the semantics of the epidemiology and public health domains. SimPHO will allow model developers to make explicit their assumptions, to describe their models in a formal, consistent and interoperable manner, and to facilitate model reuse and integration. To illustrate the use of SimPHO, we describe one software application driven by this ontology, an automated visualization tool for generating interactive web-based diagrams of population health simulation models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.906
Threshold uncertainty score0.591

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it