MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145900245 · doi:10.5539/jas.v1n2p101

A Microcontroller-Based Monitoring System for Batch Tea Dryer

2009· article· en· W2145900245 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marjan Javanmard, K.A. Abbas, Farshad Arvin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFuzzy Logic and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsData loggerMicrocontrollerMoistureProcess (computing)Water contentController (irrigation)Environmental scienceProcess engineeringComputer hardwareComputer scienceEngineeringMaterials scienceOperating systemComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an automated tea dryer system based on programmable controller which controls moisture contentof the tea leaves and temperature of the chamber in different stages of drying. Several techniques were used for teadrying systems according to the tea genres. The batch tea dryer is designed with 6 to 8 trays. The temperature above thetrays is controlled between 50ºC and 100ºC. Moreover, the moisture content of the tea leaves declined from around 68%to approximately under 3%. In addition, the temperature of the leaves increased from a little less than 30ºC to 80ºC. Amicrocontroller as the main processor was deployed to process received data from sensors and also it provides controlsignals. Thus, this system equipped a data logger memory to record data during drying process. The analyses of dryerproducts shown the feasibility of using propose system for batch tea drying.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicFuzzy Logic and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207