Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We compare the diurnal pattern of power price for weekdays and weekends for 14 deregulated markets, and find significant differences. All markets show low early morning prices with one or more price peaks during the day and evening. North American markets show a weekday monotonic pattern; European and New Zealand markets show a "double peak" pattern. Markets differ in the ratio of daily maximum to minimum price and of average weekday to average weekend price, and hence have a different incentive for time shifting power consuming activities within and between days. Data were filtered to remove days of high or low price excursions. In some but not all markets both the average price and the diurnal price pattern change significantly; infrequent price excursions shape price patterns. Price shows a significant correlation to load in some but not all markets. Some deregulated markets have patterns that are consistent and predictable and encourage a customer to shape power consuming activities, while other markets show a far lower degree of consistency, and create a high incentive to hedge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it