MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145972416 · doi:10.1109/acc.2007.4282703

Synthesis Method for Hierarchical Interface-based Supervisory Control

2007· article· en· W2145972416 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... American Control Conference/Proceedings of the American Control Conference · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPetri Nets in System Modeling
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupervisorControllabilityComputer scienceSupervisory controlSet (abstract data type)Interface (matter)AlgorithmConstruct (python library)High-level synthesisTheoretical computer scienceControl (management)Programming languageDistributed computingEmbedded systemMathematicsArtificial intelligenceOperating systemApplied mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hierarchical Interface-based Supervisory Control (HISC) decomposes a discrete-event system (DES) into a high-level subsystem which communicates with n ges 1 low- level subsystems, through separate interfaces which restrict the interaction of the subsystems. It provides a set of local conditions that can be used to verify global conditions such as nonblocking and controllability. As each clause of the definition can be verified using a single subsystem, the complete system model never needs to be stored in memory, offering potentially significant savings in computational resources. Currently, a designer must create the supervisors himself and then verify that they satisfy the HISC conditions. In this paper, we develop a synthesis method that can take advantage of the HISC structure. We replace the supervisor for each level by a corresponding specification DES. We then do a per level synthesis to construct for each level a maximally permissive supervisor that satisfies the corresponding HISC conditions. We define a set of language based fixpoint operators and show that they compute the required level-wise supremal languages. We then discuss the complexity of the algorithms that we have constructed that implement the fixpoint operators and show that they potentially offer significant improvement over the monolithic approach. A large manufacturing system example (estimated worst case statespace on the order of 10 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">22</sup> ) extended from the AIP example is discussed. A software tool for synthesis and verification of HISC systems using our approach was also developed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.774
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0120.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it