MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145975143 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2006.128

CTH16-6: Adaptive Coding and Modulation for Hybrid ARQ Systems over Partially Observable Nakagami-m Fading Channels

2006· article· en· W2145975143 on OpenAlexafffund
Ashok Karmokar, Vijay K. Bhargava

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobecom · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLink adaptationComputer scienceFadingHybrid automatic repeat requestChannel state informationObservableAlgorithmAutomatic repeat requestAdaptive codingTransmitterCoding (social sciences)Telecommunications linkMarkov processChannel (broadcasting)Decoding methodsComputer networkWirelessMathematicsTelecommunicationsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study coding and modulation rate adaptation problem for HARQ systems with partially observable state from cross-layer viewpoint. The rate of convolutionally coded M-QAM is adapted jointly with buffer state and channel state. We assume that perfect channel state information is not known at the transmitter, but it can be estimated from previous actions and observations. POMDP-based approach is utilized to formulate the problem, where average throughput is maximized, and average delay, packet error rate and overflows are minimized. To solve the cross-layer adaptation problem approximately, we discuss two heuristic-based methods and compare their applicability with completely observable channel state case by simulation results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobecomSame topicAdvanced Wireless Network OptimizationFrench-language works237,207