MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146234960 · doi:10.1002/cpe.1791

A MapReduce‐supported network structure for data centers

2011· article· en· W2146234960 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueConcurrency and Computation Practice and Experience · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceData structureTree (set theory)Network structureTree structureBig dataData centerDistributed computingData miningComputer networkOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY Several novel data center network structures have been proposed to improve the topological properties of data centers. A common characteristic of these structures is that they are designed for supporting general applications and services. Consequently, these structures do not match well with the specific requirements of some dedicated applications. In this paper, we propose a hyper‐fat‐tree network (HFN): a novel data center structure for MapReduce, a well‐known distributed data processing application. HFN possesses the advanced characteristics of BCube as well as fat‐tree structures and naturally supports MapReduce. We then address several challenging issues that face HFN in supporting MapReduce. Mathematical analysis and comprehensive evaluation show that HFN possesses excellent properties and is indeed a viable structure for MapReduce in practice. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score0.508

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it