MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146289663 · doi:10.5006/1205

Intergranular Stress Corrosion Cracking Growth Behavior of Ni-Cr-Fe Alloys in Pressurized Water Reactor Primary Water

2014· article· en· W2146289663 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCORROSION · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAtomic Energy of Canada Limited
KeywordsStress corrosion crackingMetallurgyMaterials sciencePressurized water reactorAlloyIntergranular corrosionCorrosionNickelCrackingAusteniteComposite materialMicrostructureNuclear engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this research was to compare the stress corrosion cracking (SCC) resistance of materials used at the present time for steam generator (SG) tubing in pressurized water reactor (PWR) primary water. Our results in PWR primary water for 20% cold-worked (CW) Alloy 800 (UNS N08800) are compared with already published data for SCC growth from 20%CW Alloy thermally treated (TT)690 (UNS N06690), 20%CW Alloy mill-annealed (MA)600 (UNS N06600), and 20%CW austenitic stainless steels. The second purpose was to examine the dependence of SCC growth on nickel and chromium in PWR primary water; the objective was to obtain the basic knowledge to understand SCC behavior of SG tubing materials. The third objective was to understand whether accelerated testing at higher temperatures is appropriate for predicting SCC initiation and growth at lower temperatures. For these objectives, SCC growth was measured in PWR primary water at 290, 320, 330, 340, and 360°C under static load conditions. Tests were performed using 0.5T compact tension-type specimens using laboratory-melted 20%CW Alloy 800 (UNS N08800, CW800NG) and 20%CW X%Ni-16%CW-Fe alloys in the range of nickel concentration between 16% to 60%. Four important patterns were observed. First, excellent SCC growth resistance was observed for 20%CW 800NG at 320°C and 340°C; second, significant effect of nickel on IGSCC resistance was observed at 340°C and 360°C. The rate of IGSCC growth decreases with increasing nickel concentration in the range of nickel concentration between 10% to 25% nickel; then, the rate of IGSCC increases with increasing nickel concentration in the range of nickel content between 50% to 76%. This trend is quite similar to the results reported by Coriou and Staehle tested in dearated pure water at 350°C. No significant dependence of IGSCC in pure water at 320°C and 290°C was observed. The change in SCC growth dependence on nickel concentration suggested that the main rate-limiting processes on IGSCC growth seems to change between 320°C to 340°C. Third, significant beneficial effects of chromium in alloys were observed at 320°C. However, no beneficial effect of chromium addition in alloys was observed at 360°C. Finally, peak temperatures in growth rate of IGSCC were observed in almost all test materials except for 20%CW Alloy 600. The most important engineering meaning of the complicated temperature dependence with peak is that the mechanism of IGSCC growth at higher temperature is different from that at operating temperature. Furthermore, the order of SCC resistance at higher temperature is not the same at operating temperature. This means that we should pay careful attention to assess SCC from accelerated testing at higher temperatures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it