MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146415053 · doi:10.1109/icme.2010.5583171

An efficient depth map estimation technique using complex wavelets

2010· article· en· W2146415053 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicImage Processing Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaveletFocus (optics)Wavelet transformTransformation (genetics)Computer scienceMeasure (data warehouse)Quadrature (astronomy)Artificial intelligenceComputer visionOperator (biology)Noise (video)Multiresolution analysisAlgorithmPattern recognition (psychology)Image (mathematics)Wavelet packet decompositionData miningElectronic engineeringEngineeringOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new focus measure system is proposed based on complex wavelet transform and quadrature pair of steerable filters. In shape from focus (SFF), noise, illumination variation and oriented features degrade the performance of focus measure operator. This paper introduces the use of complex wavelets due to shift-invariance and directionality of the transformation suitable for detecting various types of features which plays a pivotal role in depth estimation of a scene. A quadrature pair of steerable filters is employed to measure focus by calculating the local oriented energy of the detected features. Experimental examples are provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the approach and the results compare favorably to well-documented methods in literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.776
Threshold uncertainty score0.357

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it