Automatic Segmentation of Large Power Systems Into Fuzzy Coherent Areas for Dynamic Vulnerability Assessment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes a technique for partitioning a large power system into a number of coherent electric areas for possible application to dynamic vulnerability assessment. The coherency concept and a fuzzy clustering algorithm grouping of buses are combined to achieve this goal. The clusters are obtained by selecting representative buses from the data set in such a way that the total fuzzy dissimilarity within each cluster is minimized. The initialization problem of the conventional fuzzy c-means algorithm, which usually leads to multiple solutions, is suitably tackled by incorporating the maximum-dissimilarity based sequential phasor measurement unit (PMU) placement technique. Results of bus grouping for two test systems of three and nine areas demonstrate the potential of the approach. It is observed that such an approach to bus grouping results in a PMU configuration with minimum number of devices and fast data aggregation for a wide-area measurement system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it