MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147046207 · doi:10.1109/newcas.2005.1496705

Adaptive Equalization of A Communication Channel-in A Non-Gaussian Noise Environment

2005· article· en· W2147046207 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdaptive filterComputer scienceMean squared errorGaussian noiseKernel adaptive filterLeast mean squares filterAdaptive equalizerControl theory (sociology)AlgorithmRobustness (evolution)Recursive least squares filterRoot-raised-cosine filterMatched filterFilter designElectronic engineeringFilter (signal processing)Channel (broadcasting)Equalization (audio)MathematicsEngineeringTelecommunicationsStatisticsArtificial intelligenceComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The subject of adaptive filters constitutes an important part of statistical signal processing. Adaptive filters are successfully applied in such diverse fields as communications, control, radar, sonar, and biomedical engineering. In this paper we study the use of the particle filter for adaptive equalization of a linear dispersive channel that produces (unknown) distortion. The performance of the adaptive filter is compared to that of least-mean-square (LMS) and recursive-least-square (RLS) algorithms. The main advantage of the particle filter when compared to other algorithms is its robustness when dealing with non-Gaussian noise. The particle filter showed better performance in convergence speed and root-mean-square (rms) error in case of low signal-to-noise ratio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it