Explicit Forecasts of Hail Occurrence and Expected Hail Size Using the GEM–HAILCAST System with a Rainfall Filter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract HAILCAST is a numerical model developed specifically to predict the size of the largest hail reaching the ground. It consists of a steady-state cloud model combined with a time-dependent hailstone growth model. The regional version of the Canadian Global Environmental Multiscale (GEM) model is used to provide prognostic model soundings that are used as input data for HAILCAST. A map of forecasted maximum hail size is thereby obtained. Because hail is typically accompanied by rain, it would be advantageous if the GEM–HAILCAST system were to predict the occurrence of hail only in those regions where the GEM model was predicting precipitation. Hence, the utility of applying a forecast rainfall mask from the GEM model to restrict hail forecasts to those areas where rainfall is forecast during a 12-h window centered on 0000 UTC was tested. The accumulated precipitation filter is objective and integrates both the thermodynamic and dynamic output from the GEM model over many time steps. To test the utility of applying the GEM forecast precipitation mask, the masking technique was applied to HAILCAST-predicted maximum hail size maps for the three Canadian prairie provinces between 1 June and 31 August 2000. Several case studies will be presented to illustrate the usefulness of adding the precipitation mask. Verification statistics confirm that applying the rainfall mask tends to slightly reduce the false alarm ratio while still identifying the majority of hail events within a special study area over southern Alberta. The performance of the precipitation masking technique was not as effective on severe hail days, especially when attempting to identify both the occurrence and location of severe hail swaths.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".