La position syntaxique du thème des verbes à sujet d’expérience datif
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Selon la hiérarchie des rôles thématiques (Grimshaw 1990, Jackendoff 1990), le sujet d’expérience doit toujours occuper une position plus haute que celle du thème dans la structure de base. En espagnol, les verbes psychologiques comme gustar ‘ plaire’ ont attiré l’attention des linguistes puisqu’ils semblent violer cette hiérarchie (Parodi-Lewin 1991). Le fait que le thème de ces verbes psychologiques déclenche l’accord sur le verbe est considéré comme une preuve de son statut de sujet. Cette étude montre que le thème des verbes psychologiques a une série de propriétés qui le distinguent des sujets canoniques en espagnol. Ces différences m’amènent à conclure que le thème des verbes étudiés est plutôt un sujet ergatif situé en [Spec, Agr O ].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".