MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147228131 · doi:10.7202/009314ar

La position syntaxique du thème des verbes à sujet d’expérience datif

2004· article· fr· W2147228131 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue québécoise de linguistique · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Selon la hiérarchie des rôles thématiques (Grimshaw 1990, Jackendoff 1990), le sujet d’expérience doit toujours occuper une position plus haute que celle du thème dans la structure de base. En espagnol, les verbes psychologiques comme gustar ‘ plaire’ ont attiré l’attention des linguistes puisqu’ils semblent violer cette hiérarchie (Parodi-Lewin 1991). Le fait que le thème de ces verbes psychologiques déclenche l’accord sur le verbe est considéré comme une preuve de son statut de sujet. Cette étude montre que le thème des verbes psychologiques a une série de propriétés qui le distinguent des sujets canoniques en espagnol. Ces différences m’amènent à conclure que le thème des verbes étudiés est plutôt un sujet ergatif situé en [Spec, Agr O ].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.251
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it