MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147242451 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2008.4518057

Controlling the false discovery rate in modeling brain functional connectivity

2008· article· en· W2147242451 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFalse discovery rateComputer scienceGraphical modelRandomnessA priori and a posterioriConditional dependenceFunctional connectivityArtificial intelligenceMachine learningWord error rateData miningPattern recognition (psychology)NeuroscienceMathematicsStatisticsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Graphical models of brain functional connectivity have matured from confirming a priori hypotheses to an exploratory tool for discovering unknown connectivity. However, exploratory methods must control the error rate of "discovered" connectivity networks. Here we explore an error-rate-control method for graphical models which controls the false-discovery-rate (FDR) of the conditional-dependence relationships that a graphical model encodes. The application of this method to a group analysis of fMRI study on Parkinson's disease shows that it effectively controls the errors introduced by randomness, and yields meaningful and consistent results. The proposed approach appears promising for functional-connectivity modeling and deserves further investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.873
Threshold uncertainty score0.783

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it