MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147584640 · doi:10.1109/dftvs.2002.1173496

Manufacturability analysis of analog CMOS ICs through examination of multiple layout solutions

2003· article· en· W2147584640 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D IC and TSV technologies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDesign for manufacturabilityCMOSIntegrated circuit layoutIC layout editorCADPhysical designComputer scienceDesign layout recordElectronic engineeringIntegrated circuit designReliability engineeringTechnology CADSemiconductor device modelingIntegrated circuitCircuit designEngineeringEngineering drawingCircuit extractionElectrical engineeringEquivalent circuit

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduces a methodology for the manufacturability analysis of analog CMOS ICs. The methodology is based on examination of several layout solutions of a single circuit. A critical area approach to evaluate a theoretical random-defect limited yield is applied for each layout solution. Users can choose the appropriate layout solution after comparing the theoretical yield values and considering results obtained from economical post-layout simulation tools. The theoretical yield has been proposed as one of possible quality factors in the design for manufacturability. The multi-layout approach, which is presented here, has been implemented in a CAD tool (ALDAC). The use of this CAD tool for layout generation and analysis of circuit manufacturability will be presented here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.426
Threshold uncertainty score0.257

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topic3D IC and TSV technologiesFrench-language works237,207