Opportunistic Spectrum Access Using Partially Overlapping Channels: Graphical Game and Uncoupled Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article investigates the problem of distributed channel selection in opportunistic spectrum access (OSA) networks with partially overlapping channels (POC) using a game-theoretic learning algorithm. Compared with traditional non-overlapping channels (NOC), POC can increase the full-range spectrum utilization, mitigate interference and improve the network throughput. However, most existing POC approaches are centralized, which are not suitable for distributed OSA networks. We formulate the POC selection problem as an interference mitigation game. We prove that the game has at least one pure strategy NE point and the best pure strategy NE point minimizes the aggregate interference in the network. We characterize the achievable performance of the game by presenting an upper bound for aggregate interference of all NE points. In addition, we propose a simultaneous uncoupled learning algorithm with heterogeneous exploration rates to achieve the pure strategy NE points of the game. Simulation results show that the heterogeneous exploration rates lead to faster convergence speed and the throughput improvement gain of the proposed POC approach over traditional NOC approach is significant. Also, the proposed uncoupled learning algorithm achieves satisfactory performance when compared with existing coupled and uncoupled algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".