MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147759467 · doi:10.1185/030079906x132541

Relationship between hemoglobin level and quality of life in anemic patients with chronic kidney disease receiving epoetin alfa

2006· article· en· W2147759467 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Medical Research and Opinion · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicErythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalGroup for Research in Decision Analysis
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEpoetin alfaKidney diseaseHemoglobinAnemiaInternal medicineErythropoietinQuality of life (healthcare)Intensive care medicineGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relationship between hemoglobin (Hb) level and quality of life (QOL) in anemic patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease receiving epoetin alfa. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A post-hoc analysis using data from a multicenter, open-label, prospective study of epoetin alfa for anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis was conducted. The relationship between Hb and QOL was analyzed using correlation and longitudinal analyses, the latter adjusting for sample selection bias. The Linear Analog Scale Assessment (LASA) and the Kidney Disease Questionnaire (KDQ) subscales were used to measure QOL. The impact of an incremental 1 g/dL increase in Hb level on LASA and KDQ scores was determined using an incremental analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1183 and 1044 patients formed the study populations for the LASA and KDQ analyses, respectively. There was a positive and significant relationship between Hb levels and QOL (p < 0.05). Using non-linear regression analysis, we characterized the sigmoid-shape of the relationship between Hb levels and QOL scores. Hemoglobin change was a statistically significant determinant of QOL improvement for both LASA and KDQ scales (p < 0.05). The model predicted that, based on a 2 unit change in Hb, the greatest incremental QOL improvement per unit of Hb increase occurred when Hb was in the range of 11 to 12 g/dL. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that, beyond the well-known relationship between Hb increases and QOL improvements, the maximal incremental gain in QOL occurred when Hb reached 11 to 12 g/dL. This suggests that treating anemic patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease until their Hb level reaches 12 g/dL will result in the greatest QOL improvement per Hb unit increase. The analyses were conducted based on an open-label study of epoetin alfa and could be further validated using a randomized, controlled trial, comparing incremental gains in QOL associated with treatment initiation at varying levels of Hb across arms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.523

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.161
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it