MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Monitoring Structural Response of a Wooden Light-Frame Industrial Shed Building to Environmental Loads

2005· article· en· W2148103429 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Structural Engineering · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWind and Air Flow Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityIntertek (Canada)Concordia UniversityUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFPInnovations
KeywordsRoofStructural engineeringWind engineeringStructural systemEnvelope (radar)Frame (networking)Wind tunnelBuilding envelopeSnowStiffnessDisplacement (psychology)Structural loadLow-riseFinite element methodEngineeringGeologyMeteorologyMechanical engineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Light-frame wooden buildings are highly complex and redundant structural systems that behave as assemblies of folded and interlocked rib-stiffened plate systems. This paper describes structural monitoring experiments on one such structure. A single storey industrial shed building located in Québec City, Canada, was monitored to determine its displacement response to wind and snow loads. Displacements were correlated with real-time estimates of these environmental loads. Observations encompassed deformations of a continuous strip of the wall and roof. Artificial (static) distributed and point loads were also applied to the structure to enhance understanding of how structural components interact. Limited finite element analysis was conducted for the rib stiffened roof system and the overall assembly, with agreement between predicted deformations and those observed under environmental or artificial loads. Measured response under snow loads confirmed theoretical expectations that composite action and load sharing are important mechanisms for light-frame buildings. The general trends for the main wind effects with steady wind direction were set, but simplified pressure coefficients had to be used for this study. A more detailed description of the wind load is needed, which can be obtained with measurements of the pressure distribution on the envelope of the building in full scale, supplemented with a wind-tunnel study. This project proved the feasibility of real-time monitoring and was the precursor for a larger monitoring project currently in progress at the University of New Brunswick.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.607
Threshold uncertainty score0.734

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it