MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148211524 · doi:10.1177/1750698014563970

Emplaced witnessing: Commemorative practices among the Wayuu in the Upper Guajira

2014· article· en· W2148211524 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMemory Studies · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMemory, violence, and history
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsContext (archaeology)TestimonialEconomic JusticeSociologyGender studiesHistoryMedia studiesCriminologyLawPolitical scienceAdvertisingArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article explores witnessing in the context of mass violation of human rights. It analyses the commemorative practices of a Wayuu community around the 2004 massacre when six Wayuu, four of them women, were killed and the entire community forcibly displaced from their ancestral territory in the north-eastern part of Colombia (Guajira region). The annual commemoration temporarily brings the displaced back to their land to share, remember and have political discussions on the demands for justice and return to the territory. During these days, the Wayuu perform plural forms of testimony through the recreation of everyday life; the walking and re-signifying of the paths and sites of destruction; the remaking of places; and the re-enactment of their demands for return. This analysis highlights the restorative nature of these emplaced forms of witnessing and the role of testimony through which leaders and elders give public voice to their suffering and resistance to violence. These practices relocate the witnessing authority of outsider researchers in a relational field where survivor testimonial practices share space, knowledge production and political agendas with outsider witnesses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.248
Threshold uncertainty score0.639

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it