MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148223907 · doi:10.1001/jama.294.23.2989

Use of Gastric Acid–Suppressive Agents and the Risk of Community-Acquired <EMPH TYPE="ITAL">Clostridium difficile</EMPH>–Associated Disease

2005· article· en· W2148223907 on OpenAlexaff
Sandra Dial

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineClostridium difficileDiseaseMicrobiologyInternal medicineAntibiotics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CONTEXT: Recent reports suggest an increasing occurrence and severity of Clostridium difficile-associated disease. We assessed whether the use of gastric acid-suppressive agents is associated with an increased risk in the community. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the use of gastric acid-suppressive agents increases the risk of C difficile-associated disease in a community population. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: We conducted 2 population-based case-control studies using the United Kingdom General Practice Research Database (GPRD). In the first study, we identified all 1672 cases of C difficile recorded between 1994 and 2004 among all patients registered for at least 2 years in each practice. Each case was matched to 10 controls on calendar time and the general practice. In the second study, a subset of these cases defined as community-acquired, that is, not hospitalized in the prior year, were matched on practice and age with controls also not hospitalized in the prior year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The incidence of C difficile and risk associated with gastric acid-suppressive agent use. RESULTS: The incidence of C difficile in patients diagnosed by their general practitioners in the General Practice Research Database increased from less than 1 case per 100,000 in 1994 to 22 per 100,000 in 2004. The adjusted rate ratio of C difficile-associated disease with current use of proton pump inhibitors was 2.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-3.4) and with H2-receptor antagonists the rate ratio was 2.0 (95% CI, 1.6-2.7). An elevated rate was also found with the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (rate ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2-1.5). CONCLUSIONS: The use of acid-suppressive therapy, particularly proton pump inhibitors, is associated with an increased risk of community-acquired C difficile. The unexpected increase in risk with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use should be investigated further.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations962
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAMASame topicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchFrench-language works237,207