MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148234869 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2010.2044905

Efficient and Reliable Broadcast in Intervehicle Communication Networks: A Cross-Layer Approach

2010· article· en· W2148234869 on OpenAlexaff
Yuanguo Bi, Lin Cai, Xuemin Shen, Hai Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer networkRelayComputer scienceRedundancy (engineering)Atomic broadcastDisseminationBroadcast domainBroadcast radiationPhysical layerQuality of serviceChannel (broadcasting)Broadcast communication networkMetric (unit)ProvisioningDistributed computingBroadcasting (networking)WirelessEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Broadcast transmission is an effective way to disseminate safety-related information for cooperative driving in intervehicle communication (IVC). However, it is fraught with fundamental challenges such as message redundancy, link unreliability, hidden terminals, and broadcast storms, which greatly degrade network performance. In this paper, we introduce a cross-layer approach to design an efficient and reliable broadcast protocol for emergency message dissemination in IVC systems. We first propose a novel composite relaying metric for relay selection by jointly considering geographical locations, physical-layer channel conditions, and moving velocities of vehicles. Based on the relaying metric, a distributed relay-selection scheme is proposed to assure that a unique relay is selected to reliably forward the emergency message in the desired propagation direction. We further apply IEEE 802.11e enhanced distributed coordination access (EDCA) medium-access control (MAC) to guarantee quality-of-service (QoS) provisioning to safety-related services. In addition, an analytical model is developed to study the performance of the proposed cross-layer broadcast protocol (CLBP) in terms of the relay-selection delay and the emergency message access delay. Network Simulator (NS-2) simulation results are given to validate our analysis. It is shown that the CLBP not only can minimize the broadcast message redundancy but can quickly and reliably deliver emergency messages in IVC as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations82
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicMobile Ad Hoc NetworksFrench-language works237,207