Efficient and Reliable Broadcast in Intervehicle Communication Networks: A Cross-Layer Approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<para xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> Broadcast transmission is an effective way to disseminate safety-related information for cooperative driving in intervehicle communication (IVC). However, it is fraught with fundamental challenges such as message redundancy, link unreliability, hidden terminals, and broadcast storms, which greatly degrade network performance. In this paper, we introduce a cross-layer approach to design an efficient and reliable broadcast protocol for emergency message dissemination in IVC systems. We first propose a novel composite relaying metric for relay selection by jointly considering geographical locations, physical-layer channel conditions, and moving velocities of vehicles. Based on the relaying metric, a distributed relay-selection scheme is proposed to assure that a unique relay is selected to reliably forward the emergency message in the desired propagation direction. We further apply IEEE 802.11e enhanced distributed coordination access (EDCA) medium-access control (MAC) to guarantee quality-of-service (QoS) provisioning to safety-related services. In addition, an analytical model is developed to study the performance of the proposed cross-layer broadcast protocol (CLBP) in terms of the relay-selection delay and the emergency message access delay. Network Simulator (NS-2) simulation results are given to validate our analysis. It is shown that the CLBP not only can minimize the broadcast message redundancy but can quickly and reliably deliver emergency messages in IVC as well. </para>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it