MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148391344 · doi:10.24908/pceea.v0i0.3574

Enhancing a Junior Level Materials Lab with SEM Iimages

2011· article· en· W2148391344 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Aezeden Mohamed, Ron Britton

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Selection and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCharpy impact testAlloyScanning electron microscopeContext (archaeology)Materials scienceMetallurgyFracture (geology)Scale (ratio)AluminiumComposite materialMicrostructurePhysicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lab courses can enhance a student's communicationskills, provide opportunities to practice team work, and raise self-confidence early in their university experience, as well as impart valuable technical knowledge. Students ran impact Charpy tests on alloy steel 1045, and aluminum alloy 6061 as a function of temperature, and then analyzed and investigated by unaided eye the fracture surface in the two alloys at the macro-scale level. In this paper, micro-scale level investigation by the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images introduced for the first time in this context to enhanced junior level materials lab. Keywords: Students: SEM images: alloy steel 1045; aluminum alloy 6061; fracture surface

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.159

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)Same topicMaterial Selection and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207