Optimization of Sequential Paging in Movement-Based Location Management Based on Movement Statistics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The movement-based scheme is a dynamic location management (LM) scheme that is particularly easy to implement. Each mobile simply counts the number of cell-boundary crossings and initiates location update when this number exceeds the predefined movement threshold. Although its LM cost is inferior to that of distance-based schemes, this cost can be decreased by sequential paging methods that take into account mobiles' movement statistics. In this paper, we derive the probability distribution of a mobile's number of cell-boundary crossings during the interval between two location registrations in a movement-based LM scheme for Poisson call arrivals and generally distributed cell residence time. Based on the derived statistics, we obtain the optimal movement threshold and develop an optimal sequential paging scheme. Numeric results are presented to show that the proposed optimal sequential paging scheme outperforms existing sequential paging schemes over a wide range of call-to-mobility ratios
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it