MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148526529 · doi:10.1149/1.2790792

Formation of Dimpled Tantalum Surfaces from Electropolishing

2007· article· en· W2148526529 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAnodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcMaster UniversityFord Foundation
KeywordsElectropolishingTantalumAnodizingMaterials scienceDimpleNanostructureEtching (microfabrication)NanotechnologyElectrochemistryMetallurgyNanopillarAluminiumChemistryElectrolyteLayer (electronics)ElectrodePhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electropolishing of tantalum in concentrated acids has recently been reported to result in highly ordered arrays of nanoscale dimples. In this paper we study in more detail the electrochemical conditions affecting the formation of regularly dimpled surfaces on tantalum. Solution aging and anodization potential were found to play important roles. The chronoamperometric curves at different anodization potentials give some insight into the changing balance of processes leading to dimpling during electropolishing. We have found that dimpled tantalum can be reproducibly prepared within the anodization potential range of . Higher voltages lead to anisotropic etching of the Ta grains and the resulting surface nanostructure is no longer ordered. Overall, the dimple-formation process can be said to be robust and tunable, with great promise for nanotemplating applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.226

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it